<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Rendezvous and proximity operations Archive - SpaceWatch.GLOBAL</title>
	<atom:link href="https://spacewatch.global/tag/rendezvous-and-proximity-operations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://spacewatch.global/tag/rendezvous-and-proximity-operations/</link>
	<description>AN INDEPENDENT PERSPECTIVE ON SPACE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 11:12:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>#SpaceWatchGL GRAY SPACE – COSMOS 2612 vs ICEYE-X36: Washington Spoke. Where Was NATO?</title>
		<link>https://spacewatch.global/2026/10/spacewatchgl-gray-space-cosmos-2612-vs-iceye-x36-washington-spoke-where-was-nato/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christophe Bosquillon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geopolitics Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmos 2612]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICEYE-X36]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rendezvous and proximity operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Domain Awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spacewatch.global/?p=79393</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://spacewatch.global/2026/10/spacewatchgl-gray-space-cosmos-2612-vs-iceye-x36-washington-spoke-where-was-nato/" title="#SpaceWatchGL GRAY SPACE – COSMOS 2612 vs ICEYE-X36: Washington Spoke. Where Was NATO?" rel="nofollow"><img width="800" height="400" src="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/ICEYE_GEN4_satellite_US_4K-800x400.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="1" decoding="async" srcset="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/ICEYE_GEN4_satellite_US_4K-800x400.jpg 800w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/ICEYE_GEN4_satellite_US_4K-360x180.jpg 360w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/ICEYE_GEN4_satellite_US_4K-1140x570.jpg 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /></a><br><b> Written by Christophe Bosquillon. </br></b>  A Russian satellite manoeuvred into extreme proximity with ICEYE-X36, prompting warnings from commercial space trackers and, eventually, Washington. Christophe Bosquillon asks why the encounter has yet to produce a comparable collective response from NATO.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mission-K 2026: Natascha McVeigh of Shield Space on Autonomous Rendezvous and Satellites That Defend Themselves</title>
		<link>https://spacewatch.global/2026/10/mission-k-2026-natascha-mcveigh-of-on-autonomous-rendezvous-and-satellites-that-defend-themselves/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Torsten Kriening]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Club Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geopolitics Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autonomous spacecraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kalkar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mission-K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natascha McVeigh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rendezvous and proximity operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shield Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Control]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spacewatch.global/?p=78529</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://spacewatch.global/2026/10/mission-k-2026-natascha-mcveigh-of-on-autonomous-rendezvous-and-satellites-that-defend-themselves/" title="Mission-K 2026: Natascha McVeigh of Shield Space on Autonomous Rendezvous and Satellites That Defend Themselves" rel="nofollow"><img width="800" height="400" src="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Thumbnail_McVeigh-800x400.png" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="1" decoding="async" srcset="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Thumbnail_McVeigh-800x400.png 800w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Thumbnail_McVeigh-360x180.png 360w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Thumbnail_McVeigh-1140x570.png 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /></a>From Mission-K in Kalkar, Natascha McVeigh, Senior Mission Manager at Shield Space, joins Torsten Kriening to explain the company's autonomous rendezvous mission - a European first at 100 metres - and the ambition to give spacecraft the ability to defend themselves and continue their mission.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>LINK Spacecraft Will Not Attempt to Raise the Swift Observatory</title>
		<link>https://spacewatch.global/2026/08/link-spacecraft-will-not-attempt-to-raise-the-swift-observatory/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Hydzik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Frontiers News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In-space Servicing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katalyst Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LINK spacecraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orbital reboost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rendezvous and proximity operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Satellite Life Extension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swift]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spacewatch.global/?p=76764</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://spacewatch.global/2026/08/link-spacecraft-will-not-attempt-to-raise-the-swift-observatory/" title="LINK Spacecraft Will Not Attempt to Raise the Swift Observatory" rel="nofollow"><img width="617" height="400" src="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/LINK-617x400.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="1" decoding="async" srcset="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/LINK-617x400.jpg 617w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/LINK-300x195.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 617px) 100vw, 617px" /></a>NASA and Katalyst Space have confirmed the LINK spacecraft will not attempt to reboost the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory, after attitude-control problems ruled out a docking. LINK will still perform rendezvous and proximity operations as a technology demonstrator - while Swift, without onboard propulsion, is likely to drop below 300km by October 2026.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>#SpaceWatchGL Share: Moscow develops military space tech: should we take note? – analysis</title>
		<link>https://spacewatch.global/2022/01/spacewatchgl-share-moscow-develops-military-space-tech-should-we-take-note-analysis/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Torsten Kriening]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2022 09:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geopolitics News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Economy News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SWGL Share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltic Institute of Advanced Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burevestnik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donatas Palavenis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Numizmat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peresvet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PL19-Nudol ASAT Missile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rendezvous and proximity operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S-500]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spacewatch.global/?p=38397</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://spacewatch.global/2022/01/spacewatchgl-share-moscow-develops-military-space-tech-should-we-take-note-analysis/" title="#SpaceWatchGL Share: Moscow develops military space tech: should we take note? – analysis" rel="nofollow"><img width="602" height="400" src="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/1162691-323010-756x425-1.jpeg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="1" decoding="async" srcset="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/1162691-323010-756x425-1.jpeg 640w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/1162691-323010-756x425-1-300x199.jpeg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 602px) 100vw, 602px" /></a>Russia recently conducted a successful test of the Nudol system, shooting down one of its own satellites. However, Nudol is just one of many tools that may help Russia gain dominance in space and constrain other nations acting in space. Donatas Palavenis, of the Baltic Institute of Advanced Technology, gives a review.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
