<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Product Strategy Archive - SpaceWatch.GLOBAL</title>
	<atom:link href="https://spacewatch.global/tag/product-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://spacewatch.global/tag/product-strategy/</link>
	<description>AN INDEPENDENT PERSPECTIVE ON SPACE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 20:16:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>#SpaceWatchGL Opinion: Science-Rich, Product-Poor</title>
		<link>https://spacewatch.global/2026/08/spacewatchgl-opinion-science-rich-product-poor/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Author(s)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space for Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space for Earth Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deep Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth Observation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Strategy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spacewatch.global/?p=76521</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://spacewatch.global/2026/08/spacewatchgl-opinion-science-rich-product-poor/" title="#SpaceWatchGL Opinion: Science-Rich, Product-Poor" rel="nofollow"><img width="800" height="400" src="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Earth_from_Space_Jostedalsbreen_Norway-800x400.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="1" decoding="async" srcset="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Earth_from_Space_Jostedalsbreen_Norway-800x400.jpg 800w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Earth_from_Space_Jostedalsbreen_Norway-360x180.jpg 360w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Earth_from_Space_Jostedalsbreen_Norway-1140x570.jpg 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /></a><br><b> Written by Karolina Sarna </br></b> The most common way deep-tech and climate companies stall isn't the science. It's that no one owns the demand question, and a product manager isn't a product organisation.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
