<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Carbon Offsets Archive - SpaceWatch.GLOBAL</title>
	<atom:link href="https://spacewatch.global/tag/carbon-offsets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://spacewatch.global/tag/carbon-offsets/</link>
	<description>AN INDEPENDENT PERSPECTIVE ON SPACE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 02:37:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>#SpaceWatchGL Opinion: Carbon Offsets Pay for the Status Quo – Part I: A Tonne Is Not a Tonne</title>
		<link>https://spacewatch.global/2026/09/spacewatchgl-opinion-carbon-offsets-pay-for-the-status-quo-part-i-a-tonne-is-not-a-tonne/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Author(s)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space for Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space for Earth Featuring Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Additionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Credits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Offsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Zero]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spacewatch.global/?p=78256</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://spacewatch.global/2026/09/spacewatchgl-opinion-carbon-offsets-pay-for-the-status-quo-part-i-a-tonne-is-not-a-tonne/" title="#SpaceWatchGL Opinion: Carbon Offsets Pay for the Status Quo – Part I: A Tonne Is Not a Tonne" rel="nofollow"><img width="800" height="400" src="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/carbon-offsets-pay-for-the-status-quo-800x400.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="1" decoding="async" srcset="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/carbon-offsets-pay-for-the-status-quo-800x400.jpg 800w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/carbon-offsets-pay-for-the-status-quo-360x180.jpg 360w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/carbon-offsets-pay-for-the-status-quo-1140x570.jpg 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /></a><br><b> Written by Karolina Sarna </br></b> Most carbon offsets pay for a reduction that would have happened anyway, and even the real ones store carbon only temporarily against a fossil emission that lasts for centuries. The cleanup is making the credits look more trustworthy without changing what they are: a claim the atmosphere never registers.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
