<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Geopolitics Featuring Article Archive - SpaceWatch.GLOBAL</title>
	<atom:link href="https://spacewatch.global/space-geopolitics/geopolitics-featuring-article/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://spacewatch.global/space-geopolitics/geopolitics-featuring-article/</link>
	<description>AN INDEPENDENT PERSPECTIVE ON SPACE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 10:49:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>#SpaceWatchGL Opinion: Space for All, or Space for Those already there?</title>
		<link>https://spacewatch.global/2026/06/spacewatchgl-opinion-space-for-all-or-space-for-those-already-there/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Judith Delany]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geopolitics Featuring Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COPUOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNOOSA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spacewatch.global/?p=75041</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://spacewatch.global/2026/06/spacewatchgl-opinion-space-for-all-or-space-for-those-already-there/" title="#SpaceWatchGL Opinion: Space for All, or Space for Those already there?" rel="nofollow"><img width="800" height="400" src="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Screenshot-2026-06-18-at-11.19.33-800x400.png" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="1" decoding="async" srcset="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Screenshot-2026-06-18-at-11.19.33-800x400.png 800w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Screenshot-2026-06-18-at-11.19.33-360x180.png 360w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Screenshot-2026-06-18-at-11.19.33-1140x570.png 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /></a><br><b> Written by Judith Delany </br></b> ICAAD’s new policy brief on equity in space governance raises a question COPUOS can no longer avoid: who gets to shape the rules of the next space age?]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>#SpaceWatchGl Opinion: Can 30 People and the Vienna Spirit Carry the Future of Space?</title>
		<link>https://spacewatch.global/2026/06/spacewatchgl-opinion-can-30-people-and-the-vienna-spirit-carry-the-future-of-space/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Judith Delany]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geopolitics Featuring Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COPUOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNOOSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vienna Spirit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spacewatch.global/?p=74979</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://spacewatch.global/2026/06/spacewatchgl-opinion-can-30-people-and-the-vienna-spirit-carry-the-future-of-space/" title="#SpaceWatchGl Opinion: Can 30 People and the Vienna Spirit Carry the Future of Space?" rel="nofollow"><img width="800" height="400" src="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Screenshot-2026-06-18-at-10.56.45-800x400.png" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="1" decoding="async" srcset="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Screenshot-2026-06-18-at-10.56.45-800x400.png 800w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Screenshot-2026-06-18-at-10.56.45-360x180.png 360w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Screenshot-2026-06-18-at-10.56.45-1140x570.png 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /></a><br><b> Written by Judith Delany </br></b> As satellites multiply, geopolitical tensions rise, and space governance grows more complex, COPUOS and UNOOSA face mounting pressure to keep international cooperation alive.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>#SpaceWatchGL Analysis: Peaceful, Provided Nobody Looks Too Closely: What Does Peace Mean in Space?     </title>
		<link>https://spacewatch.global/2026/06/spacewatchgl-analysis-peaceful-provided-nobody-looks-too-closely-what-does-peace-mean-in-space/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Author(s)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geopolitics Featuring Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COPUOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outer Space Treaty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Diplomacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spacewatch.global/?p=74929</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://spacewatch.global/2026/06/spacewatchgl-analysis-peaceful-provided-nobody-looks-too-closely-what-does-peace-mean-in-space/" title="#SpaceWatchGL Analysis: Peaceful, Provided Nobody Looks Too Closely: What Does Peace Mean in Space?     " rel="nofollow"><img width="800" height="400" src="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/art002-e-21208-800x400.webp" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="1" decoding="async" srcset="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/art002-e-21208-800x400.webp 800w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/art002-e-21208-360x180.webp 360w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /></a><br><b> Written by Raoul Cardellini Leipertz </br></b> How an old compromise still shapes the future of outer space. Because the Outer Space Treaty did not settle the meaning of peace. It gave the world a word broad enough to hold several disagreements at once, and sturdy enough, for a time, to hold up the sky.	]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>#SpaceWatchGL Opinion: From Hobby to High Ground: Germany Maps Its Military Space &#8211; All the Way to the Moon</title>
		<link>https://spacewatch.global/2026/06/spacewatchgl-opinion-from-hobby-to-high-ground-germany-maps-its-military-space-all-the-way-to-the-moon/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Torsten Kriening]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[2026-6 ILA 2026]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geopolitics Featuring Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bundeswehr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cislunar Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ILA 2026]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weltraumkommando]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spacewatch.global/?p=74900</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://spacewatch.global/2026/06/spacewatchgl-opinion-from-hobby-to-high-ground-germany-maps-its-military-space-all-the-way-to-the-moon/" title="#SpaceWatchGL Opinion: From Hobby to High Ground: Germany Maps Its Military Space &#8211; All the Way to the Moon" rel="nofollow"><img width="800" height="400" src="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/IMG_3190-800x400.jpeg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="1" decoding="async" srcset="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/IMG_3190-800x400.jpeg 800w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/IMG_3190-360x180.jpeg 360w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/IMG_3190-1140x570.jpeg 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /></a><br><b> Written by Torsten Kriening </br></b>  At this year's Berlin Air Show, two positions German officials had largely kept off open stages were stated in plain terms: that the Bundeswehr's remit now reaches toward cislunar space, between Earth and Moon, and that kinetic effects against satellites remain an option in the event of war.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>#SpaceWatchGl Opinion: Do Space Infrastructure Plans Ignore Physical Reality?</title>
		<link>https://spacewatch.global/2026/06/spacewatchgl-opinion-do-space-infrastructure-plans-ignore-physical-reality/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Author(s)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geopolitics Featuring Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orbital Congestions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orbital infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Sustainability]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spacewatch.global/?p=74855</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://spacewatch.global/2026/06/spacewatchgl-opinion-do-space-infrastructure-plans-ignore-physical-reality/" title="#SpaceWatchGl Opinion: Do Space Infrastructure Plans Ignore Physical Reality?" rel="nofollow"><img width="800" height="400" src="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Orbital-Congestion-AI-Image-800x400.png" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="1" decoding="async" srcset="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Orbital-Congestion-AI-Image-800x400.png 800w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Orbital-Congestion-AI-Image-360x180.png 360w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Orbital-Congestion-AI-Image-1140x570.png 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /></a><br><b> Written by K.-P. Ludwig </br></b> The future of space may be constrained less by funding or launch capacity than by orbital physics and geopolitical competition. As military and commercial constellations proliferate, congestion, debris accumulation, and strategic rivalry are reshaping access to orbital space. The question is no longer how many satellites can be launched, but who will retain meaningful access to orbit and under what conditions.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>#SpaceWatchGL Analysis: Allied by Design Part 2: What America’s Cislunar Ambitions Mean for Europe</title>
		<link>https://spacewatch.global/2026/06/spacewatchgl-analysis-allied-by-design-part-2-what-americas-cislunar-ambitions-mean-for-europe/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Author(s)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geopolitics Featuring Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future Operating Environment 2040]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lunar economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moon Base]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Objective Force 2040]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USSF]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spacewatch.global/?p=74695</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://spacewatch.global/2026/06/spacewatchgl-analysis-allied-by-design-part-2-what-americas-cislunar-ambitions-mean-for-europe/" title="#SpaceWatchGL Analysis: Allied by Design Part 2: What America’s Cislunar Ambitions Mean for Europe" rel="nofollow"><img width="800" height="400" src="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/art002e015231large-800x400.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="1" decoding="async" srcset="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/art002e015231large-800x400.jpg 800w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/art002e015231large-360x180.jpg 360w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/art002e015231large-1140x570.jpg 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /></a><br><b> Written by Christophe Bosquillon </br></b> As the U.S. Space Force expands its focus beyond GEO and into cislunar space, Europe faces difficult questions about sovereignty, industrial capacity, defence cooperation, and its long-term role in the emerging Earth-Moon economy.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>#SpaceWatchGL Analysis: Allied by Design Part 1: How the U.S. Space Force Plans to Extend Operations Beyond GEO</title>
		<link>https://spacewatch.global/2026/06/spacewatchgl-analysis-allied-by-design-part-1-how-the-u-s-space-force-plans-to-extend-operations-beyond-ge/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Author(s)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geopolitics Featuring Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Launch Providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Launcher Challenge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future Operating Environment 2040]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Objective Force 2040]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USSF]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spacewatch.global/?p=74630</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://spacewatch.global/2026/06/spacewatchgl-analysis-allied-by-design-part-1-how-the-u-s-space-force-plans-to-extend-operations-beyond-ge/" title="#SpaceWatchGL Analysis: Allied by Design Part 1: How the U.S. Space Force Plans to Extend Operations Beyond GEO" rel="nofollow"><img width="800" height="400" src="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Screenshot-2026-06-08-at-13.26.24-800x400.png" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="1" decoding="async" srcset="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Screenshot-2026-06-08-at-13.26.24-800x400.png 800w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Screenshot-2026-06-08-at-13.26.24-360x180.png 360w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /></a><br><b> Written by Christophe Bosquillon </br></b> The U.S. Space Force's latest strategic documents envision an Allied-by-design architecture stretching from launch infrastructure to cislunar operations. This first part examines how launch capabilities, funding mechanisms, and emerging cislunar security requirements could reshape cooperation between the United States and its partners.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>#SpaceWatchGL Opinion &#8211; SmallSat Europe, Amsterdam 2026: Sovereign on Paper, Dual-Use in Practice</title>
		<link>https://spacewatch.global/2026/06/spacewatchgl-opinion-smallsat-europe-amsterdam-2026-sovereign-on-paper-dual-use-in-practice/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Torsten Kriening]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geopolitics Featuring Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual-use technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU Space Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Space Command]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European space sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[German Space Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRIS²]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SmallSat Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wolfgang Ohl]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spacewatch.global/?p=74540</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://spacewatch.global/2026/06/spacewatchgl-opinion-smallsat-europe-amsterdam-2026-sovereign-on-paper-dual-use-in-practice/" title="#SpaceWatchGL Opinion &#8211; SmallSat Europe, Amsterdam 2026: Sovereign on Paper, Dual-Use in Practice" rel="nofollow"><img width="800" height="400" src="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/IMG_2614-800x400.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="1" decoding="async" srcset="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/IMG_2614-800x400.jpg 800w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/IMG_2614-360x180.jpg 360w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/IMG_2614-1140x570.jpg 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /></a>At SmallSat Europe in Amsterdam, defence took over the show. A German general pitched a European Space Command, the EU Space Act crawled toward 2030, and the dual-use question nobody wants to answer hung over every panel. Europe spoke sovereignty fluently - and built it haltingly. A publisher's view from the RAI floor.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>#SpaceWatchGL Opinion: Space Power and the Architecture of the New World Order</title>
		<link>https://spacewatch.global/2026/06/spacewatchgl-opinion-space-power-and-the-architecture-of-the-new-world-order/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Author(s)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geopolitics Featuring Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Silk Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRIS2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outer Space Treaty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SATCOMBw 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Militarisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Supremacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategic Autonomy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spacewatch.global/?p=74340</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://spacewatch.global/2026/06/spacewatchgl-opinion-space-power-and-the-architecture-of-the-new-world-order/" title="#SpaceWatchGL Opinion: Space Power and the Architecture of the New World Order" rel="nofollow"><img width="800" height="400" src="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/art002-e-192-800x400.webp" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="1" decoding="async" srcset="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/art002-e-192-800x400.webp 800w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/art002-e-192-360x180.webp 360w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /></a><br><b> Written by K.-P. Ludwig </br></b> Europe increasingly understands the strategic importance of space, yet implementation continues to lag behind ambition. As geopolitical competition accelerates, the gap between policy objectives and operational capability is becoming harder to ignore.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>#SpaceWatchGl Opinion: Europe’s Space Industry Faces a Structural Tipping Point</title>
		<link>https://spacewatch.global/2026/05/spacewatchgl-opinion-europes-space-industry-faces-a-structural-tipping-point/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Author(s)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geopolitics Featuring Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bromo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRIS2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space & Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space sovereignty]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spacewatch.global/?p=74229</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://spacewatch.global/2026/05/spacewatchgl-opinion-europes-space-industry-faces-a-structural-tipping-point/" title="#SpaceWatchGl Opinion: Europe’s Space Industry Faces a Structural Tipping Point" rel="nofollow"><img width="800" height="400" src="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Earth_United_Kingdom_media-800x400.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="GMV to Lead UK Space Agency&#039;s &#039;TOUCAN&#039; Project to Enhance National PNT Capabilities" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="1" decoding="async" srcset="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Earth_United_Kingdom_media-800x400.jpg 800w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Earth_United_Kingdom_media-360x180.jpg 360w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Earth_United_Kingdom_media-1140x570.jpg 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /></a><br><b> Written by Gilles Rabin </br></b> Two political signals from Berlin and Washington have exposed a deeper structural issue in Europe’s space sector. The challenge is no longer technological capability, but the ability to build a market that can scale, compete, and act independently.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>#SpaceWatchGL Opinion: Boiling Frogs in Orbit- What the CSIS–SWF 2026 Threat Briefing Tells Us About Where Space Security Is Heading</title>
		<link>https://spacewatch.global/2026/05/spacewatchgl-opinion-boiling-frogs-in-orbit-what-the-csis-swf-2026-threat-briefing-tells-us-about-where-space-security-is-heading/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Torsten Kriening]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geopolitics Featuring Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dynamic space operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European space policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golden Dome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICEYE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secure World Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victoria Samson]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spacewatch.global/?p=74133</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://spacewatch.global/2026/05/spacewatchgl-opinion-boiling-frogs-in-orbit-what-the-csis-swf-2026-threat-briefing-tells-us-about-where-space-security-is-heading/" title="#SpaceWatchGL Opinion: Boiling Frogs in Orbit- What the CSIS–SWF 2026 Threat Briefing Tells Us About Where Space Security Is Heading" rel="nofollow"><img width="800" height="400" src="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Screenshot-2026-05-24-at-11.17.52-800x400.png" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="1" decoding="async" srcset="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Screenshot-2026-05-24-at-11.17.52-800x400.png 800w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Screenshot-2026-05-24-at-11.17.52-360x180.png 360w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Screenshot-2026-05-24-at-11.17.52-1140x570.png 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /></a>Torsten Kriening reviews the joint CSIS-Secure World Foundation briefing on the 2026 space threats landscape, where Kari Bingen, Victoria Samson, Kathleen Brett and Clayton Swope walked through dynamic space operations, the limits of two-line elements, and Golden Dome's trillion-dollar threshold question. The most operationally significant development of the past week, however, came from Greg Gillinger's open-source analysis of Russian Cosmos satellites manoeuvring into co-planar orbits with ICEYE-X36. A European problem.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>#SpaceWatchGL Opinion: Behind Closed Doors at DTM 2026 &#8211; Europe&#8217;s Space-Enabled ISR Problem</title>
		<link>https://spacewatch.global/2026/05/space-enabled-isr/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Torsten Kriening]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geopolitics Featuring Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bundeswehr space procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chatham House Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DTM 2026]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European space sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRIS²]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SATCOMBw 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SHAPE]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spacewatch.global/?p=74122</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://spacewatch.global/2026/05/space-enabled-isr/" title="#SpaceWatchGL Opinion: Behind Closed Doors at DTM 2026 &#8211; Europe&#8217;s Space-Enabled ISR Problem" rel="nofollow"><img width="800" height="400" src="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/1A026675-3CBB-4251-8FC2-53E239D3AC13-copy-800x400.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="1" decoding="async" srcset="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/1A026675-3CBB-4251-8FC2-53E239D3AC13-copy-800x400.jpg 800w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/1A026675-3CBB-4251-8FC2-53E239D3AC13-copy-360x180.jpg 360w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/1A026675-3CBB-4251-8FC2-53E239D3AC13-copy-1140x570.jpg 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /></a>At Deep Tech Momentum 2026 in Berlin, the conversation on European space-enabled ISR took place behind closed doors. Held under the Chatham House Rule and moderated by Lt Gen (ret) Sir Tom Copinger-Symes, the session diagnosed Europe's latency problem, the limits of national sovereignty, and the procurement gap holding German space capability back.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>#SpaceWatchGL Opinion: Golden Dome and the Cost of Deterrence in Orbit</title>
		<link>https://spacewatch.global/2026/05/spacewatchgl-opinion-golden-dome-and-the-cost-of-deterrence-in-orbit/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Author(s)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geopolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geopolitics Featuring Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golden Dome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missile Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orbital Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Congress]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spacewatch.global/?p=73951</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://spacewatch.global/2026/05/spacewatchgl-opinion-golden-dome-and-the-cost-of-deterrence-in-orbit/" title="#SpaceWatchGL Opinion: Golden Dome and the Cost of Deterrence in Orbit" rel="nofollow"><img width="800" height="400" src="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/ChatGPT-Image-May-18-2026-08_10_35-AM-800x400.png" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="1" decoding="async" srcset="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/ChatGPT-Image-May-18-2026-08_10_35-AM-800x400.png 800w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/ChatGPT-Image-May-18-2026-08_10_35-AM-360x180.png 360w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/ChatGPT-Image-May-18-2026-08_10_35-AM-1140x570.png 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /></a><br><b> Written by K.-P. Ludwig </br></b> A trillion-dollar estimate triggered a rare public pushback from the U.S. Space Force. Behind it sits a quieter shift: missile defense in orbit is no longer a question of feasibility, but of scale and execution.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>#SpaceWatchGL analysis: GEOINT 2026: The Pipeline Is the Mission &#8211; And Europe Is Falling Behind on the Plumbing</title>
		<link>https://spacewatch.global/2026/05/spacewatchgl-analysis-geoint-2026-the-pipeline-is-the-mission-and-europe-is-falling-behind-on-the-plumbing/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Torsten Kriening]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[2026-5 GEOINT 2026 Symposium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geopolitics Featuring Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agentic AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMVg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Defence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GEOINT 2026]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geospatial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USGIF]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spacewatch.global/?p=73911</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://spacewatch.global/2026/05/spacewatchgl-analysis-geoint-2026-the-pipeline-is-the-mission-and-europe-is-falling-behind-on-the-plumbing/" title="#SpaceWatchGL analysis: GEOINT 2026: The Pipeline Is the Mission &#8211; And Europe Is Falling Behind on the Plumbing" rel="nofollow"><img width="800" height="400" src="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/IMG_1967-800x400.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="1" decoding="async" srcset="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/IMG_1967-800x400.jpg 800w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/IMG_1967-360x180.jpg 360w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/IMG_1967-1140x570.jpg 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /></a><br><b> Written by Torsten Kriening </br></b>  GEOINT 2026 in Aurora delivered an uncomfortable diagnosis: the era of competing for collection is over. The real contest is now integration, governance and trustworthy AI - and Europe is falling behind on the plumbing. Torsten Kriening analyses what the symposium means for Berlin and Brussels.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>#SpaceWatchGL Opinion: Planetary Defense Joins the Supremacy Stack</title>
		<link>https://spacewatch.global/2026/05/spacewatchgl-opinion-planetary-defense-joins-the-supremacy-stack/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Torsten Kriening]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[2026-4 41st. Space Symposium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geopolitics Featuring Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artemis Accords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asteroid deflection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COPUOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EO 14369]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Bridenstine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outer Space Treaty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planetary defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Symposium 2026]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spacewatch.global/?p=73899</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://spacewatch.global/2026/05/spacewatchgl-opinion-planetary-defense-joins-the-supremacy-stack/" title="#SpaceWatchGL Opinion: Planetary Defense Joins the Supremacy Stack" rel="nofollow"><img width="800" height="400" src="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/image_planetary--800x400.png" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="1" decoding="async" srcset="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/image_planetary--800x400.png 800w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/image_planetary--360x180.png 360w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/image_planetary--1140x570.png 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /></a><br><b> Written by Torsten Kriening </br></b> At the 41st Space Symposium, a planetary defense luncheon I expected to be apolitical turned into something else. When a former NASA Administrator proposed extending the Artemis Accords to cover asteroid defense, it became clear: the last genuinely multilateral domain in space is being quietly absorbed into the American supremacy stack.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>#SpaceWatchGL Analysis: The EU Space Act and Why Türkiye Should Pay Attention</title>
		<link>https://spacewatch.global/2026/05/spacewatchgl-analysis-the-eu-space-act-and-why-turkiye-should-pay-attention/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Author(s)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geopolitics Featuring Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU Space Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European space policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkish Space Sector]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spacewatch.global/?p=73797</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://spacewatch.global/2026/05/spacewatchgl-analysis-the-eu-space-act-and-why-turkiye-should-pay-attention/" title="#SpaceWatchGL Analysis: The EU Space Act and Why Türkiye Should Pay Attention" rel="nofollow"><img width="800" height="400" src="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-07_42_11-AM-800x400.png" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="1" decoding="async" srcset="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-07_42_11-AM-800x400.png 800w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-07_42_11-AM-360x180.png 360w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-07_42_11-AM-1140x570.png 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /></a><br><b> Written by Berna Akçalı Gür, PhD</br></b> As the EU Space Act advances through the legislative process, its implications are expected to extend well beyond EU borders. For Türkiye, the regulation presents both a compliance challenge and a strategic opportunity, particularly for operators involved in launch services, satellite activities, and cooperation with European partners. This article examines the legal, geopolitical, and industrial implications of the EUSA for Türkiye’s emerging space sector.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>#SpaceWatchGL Opinion: The Kill Chain Comes Home: What Leonardo DRS&#8217;s Breakfast Briefing Tells Us About the Direction of American Homeland Defense</title>
		<link>https://spacewatch.global/2026/05/spacewatchgl-opinion-the-kill-chain-comes-home-what-leonardo-drss-breakfast-briefing-tells-us-about-the-direction-of-american-homeland-defense/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Torsten Kriening]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[2026-4 41st. Space Symposium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geopolitics Featuring Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kill Chain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonardo DRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missile Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northrop Grumman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Development Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Symposium 2026]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Space Command]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spacewatch.global/?p=73681</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://spacewatch.global/2026/05/spacewatchgl-opinion-the-kill-chain-comes-home-what-leonardo-drss-breakfast-briefing-tells-us-about-the-direction-of-american-homeland-defense/" title="#SpaceWatchGL Opinion: The Kill Chain Comes Home: What Leonardo DRS&#8217;s Breakfast Briefing Tells Us About the Direction of American Homeland Defense" rel="nofollow"><img width="800" height="400" src="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-06_17_52-AM-800x400.png" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="1" decoding="async" srcset="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-06_17_52-AM-800x400.png 800w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-06_17_52-AM-360x180.png 360w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-06_17_52-AM-1140x570.png 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /></a><br><b> Written by Torsten Kriening </br></b> Kill chains justified by homeland defense. Decisions moving to software. And allies barely mentioned. This breakfast said more than it intended.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>#SpaceWatchGL Analysis: COPUOS LSC 2026 and the politics of doing more with less</title>
		<link>https://spacewatch.global/2026/05/spacewatchgl-analysis-copuos-lsc-2026-and-the-politics-of-doing-more-with-less/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest Author(s)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geopolitics Featuring Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COPUOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Policy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spacewatch.global/?p=73618</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://spacewatch.global/2026/05/spacewatchgl-analysis-copuos-lsc-2026-and-the-politics-of-doing-more-with-less/" title="#SpaceWatchGL Analysis: COPUOS LSC 2026 and the politics of doing more with less" rel="nofollow"><img width="800" height="400" src="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Pic-3-800x400.png" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="1" decoding="async" srcset="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Pic-3-800x400.png 800w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Pic-3-360x180.png 360w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Pic-3-1140x570.png 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /></a><br><b> Written by Raoul Cardellini Leipertz </br></b> The 65th session of the Legal Subcommittee of COPUOS, held in Vienna from 15 to 22 April 2026, had all the expected ingredients of contemporary space governance.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>#SpaceWatchGL Opinion: What the Allied Space Commanders Did Not Say in Colorado Springs</title>
		<link>https://spacewatch.global/2026/05/spacewatchgl-opinion-what-the-allied-space-commanders-did-not-say-in-colorado-springs/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Torsten Kriening]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[2026-4 41st. Space Symposium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geopolitics Featuring Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allied Space Cooperation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burden Sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[French Space Command]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[German Space Command]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norwegian Intelligence Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operation Olympic Defender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outer Space Treaty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Symposium 2026]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK Space Command]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Space Force]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spacewatch.global/?p=73509</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://spacewatch.global/2026/05/spacewatchgl-opinion-what-the-allied-space-commanders-did-not-say-in-colorado-springs/" title="#SpaceWatchGL Opinion: What the Allied Space Commanders Did Not Say in Colorado Springs" rel="nofollow"><img width="800" height="400" src="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/IMG_1390-800x400.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="1" decoding="async" srcset="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/IMG_1390-800x400.jpg 800w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/IMG_1390-360x180.jpg 360w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/IMG_1390-1140x570.jpg 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /></a>The "Burden Sharing &#038; Shifting in Space" panel at Colorado Springs gathered five military space leaders from France, Germany, Norway, the UK and the US for a candid, professional conversation – about everything except the topic dominating every other room of the Broadmoor. No one said "Moon". No one said "Article II". No one mentioned EO 14369. SpaceWatch.Global Publisher Torsten Kriening on what the allied commanders said, what they did not, and why the framing was the political act.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>#SpaceWatchGL Analysis: Brussels brought a regulation to a supremacy summit</title>
		<link>https://spacewatch.global/2026/05/spacewatchgl-analysis-brussels-brought-a-regulation-to-a-supremacy-summit/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Torsten Kriening]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geopolitics Featuring Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrius Kubilius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astroscale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyprus Presidency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU Space Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lesley Jane Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outer Space Treaty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space Symposium 2026]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transatlantic Relations]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://spacewatch.global/?p=73478</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://spacewatch.global/2026/05/spacewatchgl-analysis-brussels-brought-a-regulation-to-a-supremacy-summit/" title="#SpaceWatchGL Analysis: Brussels brought a regulation to a supremacy summit" rel="nofollow"><img width="800" height="400" src="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/IMG_1496-800x400.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="" style="display: block; margin-bottom: 5px; clear:both;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="1" decoding="async" srcset="https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/IMG_1496-800x400.jpg 800w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/IMG_1496-360x180.jpg 360w, https://spacewatch.global/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/IMG_1496-1140x570.jpg 1140w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /></a><br><b>Written by Torsten Kriening</br></b>  At the 41st Space Symposium, four people who do not normally agree on much converged on the same diagnosis: the EU Space Act in its current form is in serious trouble. Four days later, Commissioner Kubilius told the European Parliament that more work is needed. SpaceWatch.Global publisher Torsten Kriening on what Brussels should be sitting with as it walks into the May Working Party sessions.]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
